Conditions of Use

Conditions of Use

All comments regarding the life and work of Lawrence Durrell are welcome. Say whatever you like, however you like. Comments are not censored, but they reflect the views of the commentator and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the administrator nor anyone else on this blog. All comments are copyrighted and belong to the blog. Fair use of the blog's material requires proper attribution both to the blog and to the commentator.

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Incest

I wrote the following introduction to the perplexing relationship between Sappho Jane Durrell and her father Lawrence Durrell.  The full essay appears in A Café in Space:  The Anaïs Nin Literary Journal, volume 11 (2014).   The link to that issue follows.  —  BR

http://www.amazon.com/Cafe-Space-Anais-Literary-Journal-ebook/dp/B00IFQKEZ2/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1392574282&sr=1-1&keywords=cafe+in+space+11




Tales of Incest:  The Agony of Saph and Pa Durrell
by
Bruce Redwine
©2014


Agon
In Autumn of 1991, Granta, a literary journal edited by Bill Buford, published a selection of Sappho Jane Durrell’s diaries, poetry, and correspondence.[1]  That issue of Granta was devoted to “The Family.”  Buford likes to shock; on the cover of the periodical, he announces his theme:  “They fuck you up,” a half line taken from the beginning of Philip Larkin’s short poem, “This Be The Verse” (1971).  The full line reads, “They fuck you up, your mum and dad.”  The final stanza (unquoted) ends with the message:

Man hands on misery to man.
It deepens like a coastal shelf.
Get out as early as you can,
And don’t have any kids yourself.[2]

Larkin’s poem was especially relevant to Sappho, although this is unclear from Buford’s subsequent remarks.

Sappho’s father was the famous writer Lawrence Durrell; her mother was his second wife, Yvette (Eve) Cohen, a native of Alexandria, Egypt.  They married in 1947; Sappho was born in 1951.  Yvette had a history of mental illness and an episode of schizophrenia diagnosed in 1953.   The parents separated in 1955 and divorced in 1957.  Sappho was raised by her mother in London.[3]  She affectionately signed her letters to her father as “Saph” (Gr., 74), often sent him “lots of love” (Gr., 88‑89), frequently lived with him during holidays, and apparently had a “close relationship” with his third wife, Claude‑Marie Vincendon (Gr., 57).

The published materials date from about 22 March 1979 to 10 July 1982.  Buford takes most of the excerpts from 1979.  In these selections, Sappho relates a troubled relationship with her “Pa” or “pap” (Gr., 73) — whom she describes as “an aggressive and demonic drunkard [who] has always lived on the edge of madness” (Gr., 62) — and details her extensive therapy with Patrick Casement, a London psychoanalyst.  Sappho’s characterization of her father is entirely plausible.  Biographers provide ample evidence that Durrell was in fact prone to violence and suffered from alcoholism in his latter years.[4]  She also refers to Nabokov’s Lolita (1955), a novel about incest and “nymphets,” as though it has personal relevance, and she insinuates incestuous relations with her father, culminating perhaps “around the age of fifteen” (Gr., 68), which would have been in 1967.  During that year, she spent the Christmas holidays with her father at his home in Sommières, France.  Durrell was then fifty‑five and a recent widower.  Claude‑Marie had died of cancer on 1 January 1967.

The extracts of Sappho’s diaries are often discursive, confused, and opaque.  They do, however, tell a story of a distraught and lonely person on the way to self‑destruction.  In 1983, she attempts suicide with an overdose of sleeping pills; her mother Yvette intervenes, and doctors save her life.  Then, on 1 February 1985, Sappho commits suicide by hanging herself.  She was thirty‑three.

Sappho’s insinuations are serious and damaging.  But how seriously should they be taken?  Should they be ignored, as Candace Fertile does in her article on incest in Durrell’s oeuvre?[5]  Should they be dismissed as the ramblings of a neurotic or schizophrenic personality?  This is the usual view of such cases.  Disbelief has long been the reaction of legal and psychiatric authorities from John Henry Wigmore to Sigmund Freud, who referred to accounts of familial incest as largely “sexual fantasy.”[6]  And incredulity is the reaction of Bill Buford, Ian S. MacNiven, Durrell’s authorized biographer, and other literary critics.  They pay little attention to the complex relationship between Durrell and his daughter.  Her side of the story, however approximate, deserves better treatment than being ignored, dismissed, or buried alive in a long footnote, as MacNiven does.[7]

Feminist scholars question the usual approach to incest.  Judith Lewis Herman, M.D., is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.  She conducted part of her research in a “clinical study” and forcefully argues that father‑daughter incest is not a fantasy, rather a “common occurrence.”  She further argues that “the greater the domination of the father, and the more the caretaking is relegated to the mother, the greater the likelihood of father‑daughter incest.”  Durrell’s household fits this profile in its broad outline.  Herman submits these definitions:

Incest was defined to mean any sexual relationship between a child and an adult in a position of paternal authority . . .  We further defined a sexual relationship to mean any physical contact that had to be kept a secret.

She also examines two types of incest:  one in which the father commits “overt” incest and another in which he exhibits seductive behavior or “covert incest.”  Herman defines “seductiveness on the part of fathers to mean behavior that was clearly sexually motivated, but which did not involve physical contact or a requirement for secrecy.”[8]  Durrell seems closest to the latter type.
 
In 1979, Sappho read Herman’s early article on incest, published by the New York Academy of Sciences, and wrote to the psychiatrist a perfectly sane and professional letter requesting further information on the subject (Gr., 82).[9]  In 1981, Herman published her full study on incest.  Sappho may have read this book, and the extent of its influence is open to debate and awaits further research.  Given Herman’s work on the subject, however, it is hard not to conclude that outright dismissal is outright negligence.  The matter deserves serious consideration.  I therefore propose that Lawrence Durrell’s literary treatment of incest, that is, his obsession with the issue, be examined closely as an insight into his and his daughter’s motivations.

The problem baffles and teases.  On the one hand, we have a talented but unstable daughter whose insinuations of paternal incest are provocative but unverifiable; on the other, we have a mercurial and authoritarian father whose writings wallow in incest and suicide.  Sappho appears to play out her father’s fantasies — with disastrous consequences.  In a perverted sense, what might be said of her is what Ben Jonson said of his son Benjamin:  “his best piece of poetry.”[10]  Daughter Sappho might be called Lawrence Durrell’s best (or worst) creation.  I shall argue that Sappho Jane Durrell may have been a victim of her father’s weird obsessions, sexual and thanatological, which include such curiosities as quoting the Marquis de Sade in the epigraphs to each of his novels comprising The Alexandria Quartet (1957‑1960).[11]




[1] Sappho Durrell, “Sappho Durrell:  Journals and Letters,” Granta 37 (Autumn 1991):  55‑92.  Hereafter cited in text as Gr.
[2] Philip Larkin, The Complete Poems:  Philip Larkin, ed. Archie Burnett (New York, 2012), p. 88.
[3] Brewster Chamberlin, A Chronology of the Life and Times of Lawrence Durrell:  Homme de Lettres (Corfu, 2007), pp. 41, 47, 49, 53, 58.  I take all dates associated with Durrell’s life from Chamberlin’s chronology.
[4] For a summary of Durrell’s personality, see Gordon Bowker, Through the Dark Labyrinth:  A Biography of Lawrence Durrell, rev. ed. (London, 1998), pp. 425-37.  See also, Chamberlin, Chronology,  pp. 53 n. 111, 79, 82, 83, 92, 93, 94.
[5] Candace Fertile, “The Meaning of Incest in the Fiction of Lawrence Durrell,” Deus Loci:  The Lawrence Durrell Journal (NS4 1995-96):  105-23..
[6] For a discussion of the historical denial of incest, see Judith Lewis Herman with Lisa Hirschman, Father‑Daughter Incest (1981; Cambridge, MA, 2000), p. 11.  John Henry Wigmore, an American law professor, wrote a major study on the law of evidence.  Herman writes, “John Henry Wigmore’s Treatise on Evidence (1934), set forth a doctrine impeaching the credibility of any female, especially a child, who complained of a sex offense.”  On Freud’s rejection of various accounts of incest, see The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887-1904, trans. and ed. Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson (Cambridge, MA, 1985), p. 264.  Freud’s letter is dated 21 September 1897.
[7] Ian S. MacNiven, Lawrence Durrell:  A Biography (London, 1998), pp. 759-60, n. 218.
[8] Herman, Father‑Daughter Incest, pp. viii, 7, 63, 70, 109.
[9] The article’s full citation:  Judith Herman and Lisa Hirschman, “Incest Between Fathers and Daughters,” The Sciences 17 (issue 7, Nov. 1977):  4-7.
[10] Ben Jonson and the Cavalier Poets:  Authoritative Texts and Criticism, ed. Hugh Maclean (New York, 1974), p. 8.  Epigrams, XLV:  “On My First Son.”
[11] Lawrence Durrell, The Alexandria Quartet:  Justine, Balthazar, Mountolive, Clea, [rev. ed.] (London, 1962), pp. 15, 208, 396, 656.  Hereafter cited in text as AlQ.

No comments:

Post a Comment